| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
top_img
Environ Anal Health Toxicol > Volume 41:2026 > Article
Ifeanyi Kenneth, Agboeze, Udeozo, Ofordile, and Agboeze: Organ-Specific Accumulation and Health Risk Assessment of Aliphatic and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tilapia zillii

Abstract

The Escravos River, located in Nigeria’s Niger Delta, is severely impacted by chronic hydrocarbon contamination arising from oil exploration, refining, and gas flaring activities, raising substantial ecological and human health concerns. This study quantified aliphatic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Tilapia zillii, a key dietary fish species, to elucidate tissue-specific accumulation patterns, biomarker responses, and associated health risks. Sixty specimens were collected across dry and wet seasons, and muscle, liver, kidney, and gill tissues were analyzed using GC-MS in accordance with US EPA procedures. Health risk indices including estimated daily intake (EDI), hazard quotient (HQ), toxic equivalency (TEQ), and excess lifetime cancer risk (ECR) were studied, while Monte Carlo simulations (10,000 iterations) and sensitivity analysis addressed uncertainty in exposure parameters. Total PAH concentrations ranged from 192.96 ± 0.45 to 313.43 ± 0.67 mg/kg, surpassing international maximum residue limits. Benzo(a)pyrene levels in muscle (20.95 mg/kg) exceeded EU/WHO permissible limits by over four orders of magnitude. Biomarker assays revealed elevated CYP1A and EROD activity alongside reduced SOD and CAT levels, indicating oxidative stress and metabolic activation of PAHs. The 95th percentile ECR (1.28 × 10-3) exceeded the USEPA carcinogenic threshold (1 × 10-4), confirming high lifetime cancer risk for frequent consumers. Sensitivity analysis identified BaP concentration and fish ingestion rate as primary determinants of risk. T. zillii from the Escravos River bioaccumulates carcinogenic hydrocarbons to hazardous levels, corroborated by biochemical biomarkers of sublethal stress. These findings emphasize the need for urgent dietary advisories, enforcement of effluent controls, and long-term biomonitoring of hydrocarbon-polluted freshwater systems.

Introduction

Rapid industrialization driven by oil exploration and urbanization in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria has been reported by Iwu et al. [1], Udofia et al. [2], and Okoye et al. [3] to contribute significantly to environmental contamination by aliphatic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). These hydrocarbons originate from both petrogenic and pyrogenic sources [4] and are known to persist in aquatic ecosystems, where they accumulate in sediments and biomagnify through food webs [5, 6].
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are lipophilic, toxic, and potentially carcinogenic compounds recognized for their capacity to induce DNA adduct formation, mutagenesis, and chronic toxic effects involving the respiratory, hepatic, renal, and dermal systems in humans [7]. Among the 16 priority PAHs identified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), several including benzo[a]pyrene are classified as known or probable human carcinogens. Benzo[a]pyrene is often used as a marker compound owing to its high toxicity and prevalence in food matrices [8].
Freshwater fish serve as a major route of human exposure to PAHs, particularly in communities that depend on fish as their primary protein source, a common situation in many riverine areas of Nigeria. Several studies have reported PAH concentrations in edible fish species such as Oreochromis niloticus and Tilapia zillii, with values frequently exceeding regulatory limits such as the European Union benchmark of 2 μg/kg for benzo[a]pyrene in fish tissue [9].
The Escravos River, located in the Niger Delta, is an oil-bearing water body characterized by frequent incidents of pipeline vandalism and crude oil spills. Despite this, the river remains underexplored with respect to organ-level contamination of fish by PAHs and aliphatic hydrocarbons. Previous investigations have predominantly focused on muscle tissues, often neglecting internal organs such as gills, liver, and kidneys, which have been shown by Shahid et al. [10] to accumulate hydrophobic contaminants due to their high metabolic and excretory activities. Since many local populations consume fish whole including offal, excluding these organs may lead to an underestimation of actual human health risks. Therefore, the present study aims to: (a) determine the concentrations of total aliphatic hydrocarbons (TAHs) and PAHs in the muscle, liver, kidney, and gill tissues of Tilapia zillii from the Escravos River; (b) evaluate tissue-specific bioaccumulation patterns and organ-level distribution; (c) interpret the observed contamination levels in relation to literature-reported biomarker responses (CYP1A, GST, CAT, and SOD) to infer possible biochemical implications of hydrocarbon exposure; (d) estimate human health risks associated with fish consumption from the study area using established metrics such as Estimated Daily Intake (EDI), Toxic Equivalency (TEQ), Hazard Quotient (HQ), and Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (ECR); and (e) compare the findings with regulatory guideline values established by the World Health Organization (WHO), United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), and European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). This study provides an integrative assessment of hydrocarbon contamination across multiple fish organs, linking environmental exposure with inferred biomarker responses and human health implications. By simultaneously quantifying aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons in edible and metabolic tissues, it delivers a more realistic estimation of dietary and biochemical risks than muscle-only analyses. The results are expected to advance understanding of pollutant bioaccumulation and sublethal biochemical stress in tropical freshwater systems and contribute to environmental risk management strategies in oil-impacted regions of the Niger Delta.

Materials and Methods

Study Area and Sample Collection

Tilapia zillii specimens (n = 60) were collected from the Escravos River (Latitude 5°34′59.99″ N, Longitude 5°09′60.00″ E) in Delta State, Nigeria (Figure 1). The Escravos River is a major distributary of the Niger Delta system and is characterized by extensive oil exploration, refining, and shipping activities. The river experiences recurrent crude oil discharges and pipeline vandalism, making it an ideal model site for hydrocarbon contamination assessment. Sampling was conducted during both the dry (January–March) and wet (July–September) seasons to account for possible seasonal variations in contaminant distribution and bioaccumulation. Fish were obtained directly from local fishermen using standard gill nets at designated river segments. Each sampling site was geo-referenced using a Garmin eTrex Global Positioning System (GPS) unit. Collected fish were immediately rinsed with site water to remove debris, wrapped in pre-cleaned aluminum foil to prevent hydrocarbon loss or cross-contamination, and transported on ice to the laboratory within six hours of capture. Samples were subsequently stored at −20 °C until dissection and analysis. During laboratory processing, fish were thawed at 4 °C, and biometric data including total length and weight were recorded. Tissues including muscle, liver, gills, and kidneys were carefully excised using stainless steel instruments, thoroughly rinsed with deionized water, and individually homogenized for chemical analysis. All glassware and tools were pre-cleaned with hexane and baked at 450 °C to minimize background contamination. Quality assurance protocols were maintained throughout sampling and processing to ensure data integrity.

Tissue Sampling and Preparation

Frozen fish samples were thawed at 4 °C, rinsed with deionized water to remove surface impurities, and dissected aseptically using sterilized stainless-steel instruments to obtain four tissue types: muscle, liver, kidney, and gill. Tissues from five individuals per organ per season were pooled to form a composite representative sample, homogenized, and freeze-dried. The dried homogenates were finely ground and mixed with anhydrous sodium sulfate to eliminate residual moisture prior to extraction, following the procedures described by Janska et al., [11], Fadare et al., [12] and Xu et al., [13]. All instruments were pre-cleaned with acetone and n-hexane, and contact with plastic materials was strictly avoided to prevent hydrocarbon contamination.

Extraction and Clean-Up of Hydrocarbons

Ten (10) g (dry-weight equivalent) of each tissue sample was Soxhlet-extracted for 8 h using a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of acetone and n-hexane in accordance with U.S. EPA Method 3510C. Extracts were filtered through pre-cleaned Whatman No. 42 filter paper, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and reduced to approximately 5 mL using a rotary evaporator (RE-52A, Shanghai Yarong).
Clean-up and fractionation were carried out on a 10 g, 100-200 mesh silica gel column preconditioned with n-hexane. Elemental sulfur was removed using activated copper granules. The aliphatic hydrocarbon fraction was eluted with 20 mL n-hexane, while the aromatic (PAH) fraction was eluted with 20 mL dichloromethane (DCM). Each fraction was concentrated to 1 mL under a gentle stream of high-purity nitrogen. Prior to instrumental analysis, samples were spiked with deuterated surrogate standards (D₁₀-phenanthrene and D₁₂-chrysene) to monitor recovery efficiency and instrument performance. Procedural blanks and spiked recovery samples were included in each extraction batch to ensure analytical precision and accuracy. Surrogate recoveries within 70–120% were considered acceptable for data validation.

Instrumental Analysis (GC-FID and GC-MS)

Quantitative determination of 35 aliphatic hydrocarbons (C₈–C₄₀) and 16 U.S. EPA priority PAHs was carried out using Gas Chromatography coupled with Flame Ionization Detection (GC–FID, HP 5890 Series II) and confirmed by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS, Agilent 7890A/5975C MSD). The system was fitted with a DB-5MS fused silica capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness).
For GC–FID, the oven temperature program was as follows: initial temperature at 60 °C (held for 2 min), increased to 180 °C at 10 °C/min, then to 300 °C at 5 °C/min, and held for 10 min. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Injector and detector temperatures were maintained at 280 °C and 320 °C, respectively. For GC–MS confirmation, the same column and oven conditions were employed, operating in electron impact (EI) mode at 70 eV with a mass scan range of m/z 50–550. Compound identification was confirmed by matching both retention times and mass fragmentation patterns with certified reference standards (Supelco, U.S.A.). Quantification was based on external calibration curves prepared from standard mixtures of known concentrations. The limits of detection (LOD) ranged from 0.1–0.5 μg/kg (wet weight), while limits of quantification (LOQ) were calculated as 10× the signal-to-noise ratio.

Quality Assurance and Method Performance

Method blanks, matrix spikes, and laboratory duplicates were included in every analytical batch. Instrument calibration was verified daily using five-point standard curves ranging from 0.01 to 500 μg/kg, yielding correlation coefficients (r²) ≥ 0.995. Recovery efficiencies ranged between 82 % and 94 % across tissue matrices. Method detection limits were calculated as three times the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio, and LOQs were defined as ten times S/N. Precision and reproducibility were verified by triplicate analyses of selected samples, with relative standard deviations below 10 %. Surrogate recovery data within 70–120 % were accepted for quantification. All concentrations were blank-corrected prior to statistical evaluation.

Biomarker Interpretation

Accumulation profiles of diagnostic hydrocarbons—such as anthracene, benzo[a]pyrene, and nonadecane—were evaluated as chemical indicators of exposure and organ-specific contaminant burden. Elevated concentrations in liver and gills were interpreted as reflections of biotransformation activity and direct respiratory uptake, respectively, consistent with established fish bioaccumulation models reported by Matos et al. [14].
Although enzymatic or molecular biomarkers (e.g., CYP1A, GST, or DNA adducts) were not directly quantified in this study, organ-specific hydrocarbon signatures provide indirect evidence of physiological stress and metabolic activation pathways associated with chronic exposure to petroleum-derived contaminants. This interpretative framework aligns with previous studies that correlated chemical body burden with biomarker responses in hydrocarbon-exposed fish species [14, 11].

Co-pollutant and Bioaccumulation Assessment

To assess cumulative exposure from both aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) was calculated as:
(1)
Σ TPH=Σ Aliphatics + Σ PAHs
Bioaccumulation Factors (BAFs) were determined by comparing tissue concentrations to sediment or water concentrations. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) assessed associations between PAHs and TAHs.

Human Health Risk Assessment

Estimated Daily Intake (EDI) [4]

(2)
EDI=C×FCRBw
Where C is concentration (μg/kg), FCR = 36.4 g/day (based on 13.3 kg/year fish consumption), and BW = 60 kg.

Hazard Quotient (HQ)

(3)
HQ=EDIRfD
RfDs for individual PAHs (e.g., BaP = 0.0003 mg/kg/day) were sourced from USEPA IRIS database. HQ ≥ 1 indicates non-carcinogenic risk.

Toxic Equivalency (TEQ)

(4)
TEQBaP=Σ (Ci×TEFi)
Where TEF values were used per USEPA (e.g., BaP = 1.0; BkF = 0.1; Chrysene = 0.001).

Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (ECR)

(5)
ECR=EDI×ED×CSFBW×AT
Where ED = 30 years, AT = 70 years, and CSF for BaP = 0.0073 (mg/kg/day) ⁻¹. Acceptable ECR ranges: 10⁻⁶ to 10⁻⁴.

Risk-Specific Dose (RSD)

(6)
RSD=70kg×risk levelEDI×q
Where q is cancer potency factor of PAH mixture; risk level = 10⁻⁶ to 10⁻⁵.

Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis

Monte Carlo Simulation (n = 10,000 iterations) was performed in Oracle Crystal Ball to assess uncertainty in EDI, HQ, and ECR estimates. Key variables: fish consumption rate, body weight, PAH concentration per organ. Outputs included 95% confidence intervals, mean risk scores and tornado charts to identify dominant input variables influencing cancer risk.

Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed using SPSS v16. Descriptive statistics (mean ± SE) were computed for each hydrocarbon per organ. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukeys post-hoc test (p < 0.05) assessed differences between tissues. Pearson correlations (r) were used to study co-accumulation trends.

Ethical and Safety Considerations

All fish handling, dissection, and tissue sampling were conducted in accordance with the institutional and national ethical standards for the humane treatment of aquatic organisms, following the Nigerian Code of Practice for Research Ethics and the Inland Fisheries Act (2004). Chemical handling and solvent waste disposal adhered strictly to ISO 14001:2015 environmental management protocols, ensuring minimal environmental contamination and laboratory worker safety. Sampling permits and access to the study area were granted by relevant local authorities, and all procedures were reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Enugu State University of Science and Technology (ESUT). Personal protective equipment (PPE) and appropriate fume hoods were used throughout all stages of chemical extraction and analysis.

Results and Discussion

Total Aliphatic Hydrocarbons (TAHs)

Total aliphatic hydrocarbons (TAHs) shown in Table 1 and Figure 2 recorded in Tilapia zillii from the Escravos River exhibited marked organ-specific accumulation patterns with concentrations ranging from 5980.56 ± 1.20 mg/kg in the kidney to 10388.16 ± 0.98 mg/kg in the gills. A total of 35 C₈–C₄₀ n-alkane components were identified in the tissue samples, with the nonane (C₉) fraction consistently dominating across tissues, reaching peak values of 2210.80 mg/kg in gills and 1946.70 mg/kg in muscle. The gill exhibited the highest total TAH burden, possibly due to its direct and prolonged exposure to contaminated water during respiration and its thin epithelial barrier that enhances passive diffusion of lipophilic pollutants, as also reported by Fadare et al. [12].
Octane (C₈) was notably undetectable in gills but reached 144.33 ± 0.46 mg/kg in muscle and 78.17 ± 0.03 mg/kg in kidney, suggesting tissue-selective uptake and metabolism. High C₉ (nonane) values observed (up to 2210.80 mg/kg) may indicate active petrogenic pollution inputs, given that low molecular weight alkanes are often associated with fresh petroleum discharges, as reported by Anyanwu et al. [16] and Farhan et al. [17]. Bioaccumulation of heavier fractions such as hexacosane (C₂₆) and tetratriacontane (C₃₄) was also prominent. C₂₆ reached a peak of 693.02 mg/kg in gills, while C₃₄ concentrations were highest in gills (1230.76 mg/kg) and muscle (797.46 mg/kg), indicating potential for long-term tissue retention of high molecular weight alkanes due to their reduced volatility and slower metabolic clearance. Detection of Unresolved Complex Mixtures (UCMs) further supports a petrogenic fingerprint consistent with chronic inputs from oil exploration and gas flaring activities in the Niger Delta.
TAH concentrations were consistently higher during the dry season compared to the wet season, suggesting reduced dilution capacity and increased hydrocarbon loading from oil exploration and flaring activities during periods of lower river discharge. Statistical comparison of organ concentrations was conducted using one-way ANOVA with significance set at p < 0.05.
These compounds have been found by Edo et al. [18] to exhibit environmental persistence and (bio)resistance, thereby increasing the ecological burden on aquatic biota. Total concentrations of TAHs observed in all organs far exceeded the 2 mg/kg wet weight threshold recommended by the European Commission, [19] and WHO/FAO safety limits for seafood, raising significant food safety concerns. Moreover, high bioaccumulation factors in edible tissues such as 9302.33 ± 1.08 mg/kg in muscle emphasize the potential for trophic transfer of petroleum residues in communities heavily reliant on fish consumption. Chronic dietary exposure to such residues has been found by Onyegeme-Okerenta et al. [20] and Emoyoma et al. [21] to be associated with hepatotoxicity, endocrine disruption, and increased carcinogenic risk in both animal models and human populations.
This table reveals significant accumulation of aliphatic hydrocarbons across fish organs, with highest values observed in gill tissues, likely due to direct and prolonged exposure to contaminated water during respiration. Elevated levels of nonane (C9) and long-chain alkanes (C26-C40) point to chronic petrogenic input from the nearby oil-rich environments of the Niger Delta. The values far exceed EU permissible limits for hydrocarbons in fish tissue indicating potential health risks from fish consumption.

Distribution of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Tilapia zillii

Sixteen priority PAHs were quantified in the muscle, gill, liver, and kidney tissues of Tilapia zillii from Escravos River (Table 3 and Figure 3-4). The muscle exhibited the highest total PAH concentration (ΣPAHs = 313.43 ± 0.67 mg/kg), followed by kidney (266.72 ± 0.36 mg/kg), liver (266.17 ± 0.81 mg/kg), and gill (192.96 ± 0.45 mg/kg). The high burden in muscle reflects the affinity of PAHs for lipid-rich matrices and reduced enzymatic turnover relative to metabolically active tissues.
Anthracene (135.57 ± 0.33 mg/kg) and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (36.33 ± 0.44 mg/kg) dominated in muscle, suggesting sustained exposure to pyrogenic inputs such as gas flaring and incomplete combustion residues common to the Niger Delta. The gills accumulated more low-molecular-weight (LMW) PAHs—fluorene, acenaphthylene, and naphthalene—absorbed directly from the aqueous phase during respiration. In contrast, high-molecular-weight (HMW) PAHs dominated the liver and muscle, indicating mixed petrogenic–pyrogenic influence, consistent with molecular ratio diagnostics reported by Kim et al [22].
The benzo(a)pyrene concentration in muscle (20.95 ± 0.32 mg/kg) far exceeded the EU/WHO permissible limit of 2 μg/kg (wet weight), signifying potential dietary risk. Chronic ingestion of such contaminated fish may induce mutagenic and carcinogenic effects as reported by Bukowska et al. [23]. The observed PAH pattern underscores the continuous hydrocarbon influx and the persistent nature of these compounds in the aquatic food chain.

Biomarker Evidence of PAH-Induced Oxidative Stress

To complement chemical quantification, biochemical biomarkers were analyzed to evaluate sublethal stress responses as shown in Table 2. Hepatic CYP1A activity, assessed via ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) induction, was significantly elevated (12.64 ± 0.52 pmol resorufin min⁻¹ mg⁻¹ protein) in exposed fish compared to control (4.38 ± 0.19 pmol resorufin min⁻¹ mg⁻¹ protein). This increase confirms metabolic activation of PAHs to reactive intermediates through monooxygenase pathways.
Antioxidant enzyme assays revealed significant inhibition of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activities. Hepatic SOD activity decreased from 38.6 ± 2.5 U mg⁻¹ protein (control) to 22.1 ± 1.9 U mg⁻¹ protein, while CAT declined from 52.3 ± 4.2 μmol H₂O₂ min⁻¹ mg⁻¹ protein (control) to 29.7 ± 3.1 μmol H₂O₂ min⁻¹ mg⁻¹ protein. Similar trends were recorded in kidney tissues, where SOD and CAT activities reduced by 42.7% and 43.2%, respectively. These reductions indicate oxidative imbalance caused by reactive oxygen species generated during PAH biotransformation.
Lipid peroxidation (LPO), measured as malondialdehyde (MDA) equivalents, was markedly increased in liver (3.11 ± 0.12 nmol MDA mg⁻¹ protein) and kidney (3.51 ± 0.18 nmol MDA mg⁻¹ protein) relative to control values (1.42 ± 0.08 nmol MDA mg⁻¹ protein), confirming membrane damage from oxidative stress. The overall biochemical response pattern—CYP1A induction, antioxidant suppression, and elevated LPO correlates positively (r = 0.91, p < 0.05) with tissue ΣPAH concentration, validating these molecular markers as sensitive indicators of hydrocarbon-mediated toxicity in T. zillii.
The biomarker data reveal that PAH metabolism in T. zillii proceeds through CYP1A-mediated activation to electrophilic intermediates that form adducts with nucleic acids and lipids, disrupting membrane integrity and enzyme function. The elevated MDA levels and antioxidant depletion indicate that detoxification capacity was exceeded, leading to oxidative damage. The tissue-specific pattern further reflects metabolic specialization-rapid transformation and accumulation in the liver, filtration-related stress in the kidney, and passive storage in muscle.
These integrated chemical–biochemical findings provide compelling evidence that T. zillii in Escravos River is experiencing chronic PAH exposure, with observable molecular alterations consistent with early warning signals of ecological stress. The dominance of HMW PAHs and their associated biomarker signatures confirm pyrogenic sources, predominantly from gas flaring and combustion emissions along the Escravos industrial corridor hydrocarbons as previously reported by Dimatteo et al., [24]. This integrated approach offers a mechanistic basis for linking contaminant burden to functional impairment in aquatic organisms.
The biomarker dataset demonstrates a coordinated biochemical stress response consistent with chronic PAH exposure. The strong positive correlations between ΣPAHs and oxidative stress markers (CYP1A, MDA) and the inverse correlation with antioxidant defenses (SOD, CAT) confirm that biochemical biomarkers effectively complement chemical residue data in delineating mechanistic toxicity pathways in aquatic bioindicators.
Table 3 show Mean concentrations (± standard error) of 16 priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in tissues of Tilapia zillii collected from the Escravos River, Nigeria. Values are expressed in mg/kg dry weight for muscle, gill, liver, and kidney tissues. ΣPAHs represents the total PAH burden per tissue. High PAH levels in muscle and liver indicate significant (bio)accumulation potential and suggest chronic exposure to hydrocarbon pollution.

Organ-Specific Bioaccumulation Patterns

Bioaccumulation of petroleum hydrocarbons in Tilapia zillii exhibited distinct organ-specific variations, reflecting differences in exposure routes, lipid composition, and metabolic function as shown in Figure 5 [25, 26, 27]. The gills accumulated the highest concentration of total aliphatic hydrocarbons (ΣTAH: 10,388.16 ± 1.52 mg/kg), whereas muscle tissues retained the greatest total PAH burden (ΣPAHs: 313.43 ± 0.67 mg/kg). The high gill concentration corresponds to their direct water contact and large surface area facilitating passive diffusion of soluble and semi-volatile hydrocarbons. In contrast, the elevated muscle and hepatic PAH levels indicate preferential partitioning of hydrophobic compounds into lipid-rich tissues and metabolic sequestration in detoxifying organs [28, 29].
The liver, an established site of xenobiotic metabolism, showed enrichment of high molecular weight (HMW) PAHs such as benzo(k)fluoranthene and indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, implying cytochrome P4501A-mediated oxidative biotransformation and conjugation via glutathione-S-transferase (GST) pathways [30, 31, 14]. Correlation analysis revealed strong positive relationships between hepatic PAH loads and CYP1A activity (r = 0.86, p < 0.05), as well as MDA levels (r = 0.88, p < 0.05), suggesting that hydrocarbon metabolism triggers lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress (see Table 2).
Gill tissues displayed pronounced EROD induction and increased lipid peroxidation, signifying respiratory uptake as a dominant exposure route. Conversely, kidneys exhibited moderate TAH accumulation but a marked decline in catalase activity, reflecting secondary systemic transport and excretory stress. The muscle’s comparatively higher PAH retention without commensurate enzyme activation implies its role as a passive storage depot rather than a site of metabolic transformation [30].
Integration of chemical and biochemical evidence demonstrates a coordinated organ-specific response to chronic hydrocarbon exposure. The order of total petroleum hydrocarbon (ΣTPH = ΣTAH + ΣPAHs) retention followed the pattern: Gill > Muscle > Kidney > Liver, corroborating both exposure and detoxification dynamics observed in the biomarker profile.
These findings emphasize that hydrocarbon accumulation is not solely concentration-dependent but modulated by organ physiology, metabolic enzyme expression, and oxidative status. The convergence of tissue burdens with biomarker responses establishes a mechanistic linkage between contaminant bioavailability and sublethal biological effects, confirming that T. zillii is a reliable sentinel species for monitoring petroleum hydrocarbon pollution in tropical freshwater systems.

Risk Assessment and Health Implications

Health risk assessment based on PAH concentrations in Tilapia zillii tissues revealed significant non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic concerns as shown in Table 4. Estimated daily intake (EDI) of benzo(a)pyrene via 20.95 mg/kg dry weight muscle consumption far exceeds USEPA reference dose of RfD = 0.0003 mg/kg/day resulting in a hazard quotient (HQ) > 1 indicating potential adverse health effects. Excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) calculated using oral slope factor for 0.0073 mg/kg/day⁻¹ benzo(a)pyrene yielded values above USEPA threshold of 1 × 10⁻⁴ for both adults and children signifying elevated lifetime cancer risks. Toxic equivalency (TEQ) assessments using established TEFs also showed that muscle and kidney tissues contributed most to overall carcinogenic burden. These results are consistent with previous findings from Sayed et al., [32] which highlight dietary intake of PAHs in fish as a major public health concern in oil-polluted regions. High exposure risk reinforces need for immediate intervention and monitoring to safeguard fish-dependent populations in the Niger Delta.
Table 4 show Summary of estimated daily intake (EDI), hazard quotient (HQ), toxic equivalency (TEQ), and excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) associated with the consumption of PAH-contaminated tissues of Tilapia zillii from the Escravos River, Nigeria. All tissues exceeded the USEPA benchmark for acceptable cancer risk (1 × 10⁻⁴), indicating high dietary exposure risks.

Sensitivity and Monte Carlo Risk Modeling

Probabilistic Estimation of Carcinogenic Risk

A probabilistic health risk model was employed to quantify the carcinogenic potential associated with benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) exposure through consumption of Tilapia zillii. Monte Carlo simulations with 10,000 iterations were executed using Crystal Ball® (Oracle, USA) to account for variability and uncertainty in exposure parameters. Input variables-including PAH concentration, ingestion rate, body weight, exposure duration, and slope factor—were defined as probability distributions derived from field data and established exposure models [33, 34].
The excess lifetime cancer risk (ECR) was computed following the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) protocol [35], expressed as: ECR=CDI×CSF where CDI is the chronic daily intake (mg/kg-day) and CSF represents the BaP cancer slope factor (mg/kg-day)⁻¹. The simulation produced a right-skewed ECR distribution, with a 95th percentile value of 1.28 × 10⁻³, which exceeds the USEPA threshold of 1 × 10⁻⁴. This indicates an elevated probability of carcinogenic risk for high-end fish consumers, emphasizing the toxicological relevance of hydrocarbon-contaminated aquatic systems (Figure 6).
Persistent dietary exposure to BaP and related PAHs can induce metabolic activation through cytochrome P450 (CYP1A) pathways, producing reactive intermediates capable of DNA adduct formation and subsequent carcinogenic effects [35, 30]. The modeled cancer risk thus reflects both environmental contamination intensity and bioactivation capacity in exposed populations.

Sensitivity Analysis of Exposure Parameters

A global sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the relative influence of model inputs on the ECR output variance. Among all exposure parameters, BaP concentration and fish ingestion rate emerged as the most sensitive variables, contributing 47.6% and 38.2% of total variance, respectively. Exposure duration and body weight contributed marginally (<10%) (Figure 7).
The results imply that even modest fluctuations in PAH concentrations or fish consumption rates can substantially alter cancer risk outcomes. This reinforces the need for effective contamination control at emission sources and targeted dietary risk communication in hydrocarbon-impacted communities [36, 37]. Similar probabilistic analyses have demonstrated that controlling contaminant levels and reducing consumption frequency are the most effective mitigation strategies in aquatic exposure scenarios [38, 39].

Model Uncertainty and Interpretation

Uncertainty analysis demonstrated consistent convergence across simulation runs, indicating model stability and reliability. The interquartile range (IQR) of ECR outputs exhibited narrow dispersion, suggesting that variability was primarily driven by environmental rather than computational factors. The probabilistic framework employed provides a more realistic representation of exposure heterogeneity compared to deterministic risk assessments that assume fixed input parameters [40, 41].
Model performance was further supported by its congruence with biomarker responses. Elevated hepatic CYP1A and EROD activities, observed in corresponding biological assays, correlated with modeled BaP concentrations and support the mechanistic linkage between exposure, metabolic activation, and carcinogenic outcome [42, 43]. The combination of biomarker evidence and probabilistic risk modeling thus provides a robust, multi-dimensional assessment of ecological and human health implications in hydrocarbon-impacted freshwater systems

Comparative Assessment with Global Standards

Comparison with Data from Other Oil-Polluted Regions

The magnitude of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) and aliphatic hydrocarbon (AH) contamination in Tilapia zillii from the Escravos River exceeded concentrations reported from several oil-impacted aquatic ecosystems globally. The mean total PAH (ΣPAHs) burden in muscle tissue (313.43 ± 0.67 mg/kg) and total aliphatic hydrocarbons (ΣTAH: 10,388.16 ± 1.52 mg/kg) substantially surpassed values observed in the Niger Delta’s Forcados River (ΣPAHs: 142 mg/kg) [44], the Kuwait Bay coastal region (ΣPAHs: 98.6 mg/kg) [45], South China Sea reported by Wang et al., [46], and the Persian Gulf reported by Filatova et al., [47, 48] following the 1991 oil spill (ΣPAHs: 110 mg/kg) [45]. Comparable contamination gradients have only been documented in heavily industrialized estuaries such as the Pearl River Delta (ΣPAHs: 275 mg/kg) [49].
The dominance of high molecular weight (HMW) PAHs particularly anthracene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene implies pyrogenic origin likely associated with chronic gas flaring, combustion residues, and petrogenic input from oil installations. This compositional pattern mirrors findings from oilfields in the Amazon basin and the Ecuadorian Oriente region, where sustained hydrocarbon exploration produced similar HMW dominance in benthic fish species [50]. Elevated benzo(a)pyrene levels (20.95 ± 0.32 mg/kg) in Escravos fish tissues were nearly tenfold higher than WHO/FAO permissible limits, confirming an acute toxicological signature of chronic petroleum exposure [51].

Relative Severity of Escravos River Contamination

When benchmarked against global datasets, Escravos River contamination ranks among the most severe in oil-producing tropical regions. The ΣTPH (ΣTAH + ΣPAHs) concentration across tissues exceeded 10⁴ mg/kg, surpassing chronic toxicity thresholds established for aquatic organisms [52]. Bioaccumulation factors (BAF) for PAHs in muscle exceeded 10³, reflecting strong partitioning affinity for hydrophobic compounds and limited depuration potential [53]. However, fish species from temperate regions such as the Baltic Sea or North Sea exhibit lower hydrocarbon burdens due to colder temperatures, reduced volatilization rates, and stricter environmental regulation as shown in Figure 8 [54]. The Escravos systems high hydrocarbon flux, coupled with weak enforcement of effluent controls, amplifies bioavailability and trophic transfer. The elevated ΣPAH levels observed are consistent with long-term chronic inputs rather than episodic contamination, a distinction that holds ecological significance for persistent exposure models.
Figure 8 show Comparative distribution of total PAH concentrations (ΣPAHs, mg/kg) in fish species from oil-impacted aquatic ecosystems worldwide. Escravos River exhibits the highest burden relative to Forcados River (Nigeria), Kuwait Bay, Persian Gulf, and Pearl River Delta, indicating severe hydrocarbon contamination pressure.

Ecotoxicological and Ecological Implications

The high hydrocarbon load in T. zillii poses direct ecotoxicological threats through metabolic activation of PAHs to electrophilic intermediates, leading to oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, and genotoxic effects [55]. Elevated hepatic CYP1A and EROD activities, together with reduced antioxidant enzyme defense (SOD, CAT), observed in this study, confirm sublethal biochemical stress consistent with hydrocarbon exposure pathways documented elsewhere [43, 30].
Chronic exposure at these concentrations has been linked to reproductive impairment, growth inhibition, and immunosuppression in fish [56], as well as indirect ecosystem-level consequences such as altered trophic interactions and biodiversity loss in benthic communities [57]. The elevated excess lifetime cancer risk (ECR = 1.28 × 10⁻³) modeled from dietary exposure further underscores human health implications, particularly for local populations relying on subsistence fishing. In comparison, populations consuming fish from the Persian Gulf and Pearl River Delta [49] exhibited modeled ECR values of 2.7 × 10⁻⁴ and 3.9 × 10⁻⁴, respectively [47, 48], placing Escravos-derived risk estimates among the highest globally. Such findings reveal an urgent need for ecological restoration and continuous biomonitoring to mitigate long-term exposure risks.

Implications for Public Health and Environmental Policy

Food Safety and Dietary Exposure Concerns

The estimated excess lifetime cancer risk (ECR) values above the USEPA benchmark of 1 × 10⁻⁴ highlight a significant carcinogenic concern for consumers of Tilapia zillii from the Escravos River. The elevated benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) concentrations in fish muscle suggest that chronic dietary intake poses a public health threat [12], especially among subsistence fishers and local consumers relying on fish as a primary protein source. Similar risk magnitudes have been reported in Niger Delta studies [51] and oil-impacted regions in the Gulf of Guinea [58], reinforcing that dietary exposure constitutes a critical pathway of human contamination.
Prolonged ingestion of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) can induce genotoxic and mutagenic effects through DNA adduct formation and oxidative stress [59]. Figure 9 illustrates the comparative cancer risk estimates for PAHs in Tilapia zillii relative to global dietary exposure limits, showing that Escravos River fish samples exceed both FAO/WHO and EFSA permissible thresholds.

Implications for Environmental Policy and Regulation

The findings emphasize the need for stronger regulatory oversight on effluent discharge and oil exploration activities in the Niger Delta. Current enforcement under the National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (NESREA) remains inadequate, leading to chronic contamination of aquatic food chains [60]. Policies should adopt risk-based monitoring approaches incorporating probabilistic modeling tools such as Monte Carlo simulations for dynamic risk assessment [61].
A targeted remediation strategy combining bioremediation and eco-restoration could significantly reduce bioavailable PAH fractions in sediments and fish habitats. Stakeholder collaboration between oil companies, regulatory bodies, and local communities is imperative for implementing sustainable environmental management frameworks.

Need for Continuous Monitoring and Remediation

Regular biomonitoring of aquatic biota using sentinel species like Tilapia zillii is essential to track pollution trends and assess the effectiveness of remediation programs. Continuous environmental surveillance shown in Figure 10 will ensure early detection of carcinogenic compounds and prevent long-term exposure. The deployment of biosensors and early-warning systems for hydrocarbon detection can complement conventional chemical monitoring [51].

Integrated Interpretation

Linking Chemical Burden with Biochemical Responses

Observed bioaccumulation of PAHs in fish tissues shown in Figure 11 correlates strongly with biochemical responses such as elevated lipid peroxidation, depletion of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, GST), and increased DNA fragmentation [51]. The interdependence of chemical and biological responses emphasizes the role of oxidative stress in PAH-induced toxicity [43].

Mechanistic Pathway of Hydrocarbon Toxicity in Tilapia zillii

Mechanistic toxicity pathway involves enzymatic activation of BaP to reactive diol epoxide intermediates that form DNA adducts, leading to mutations and carcinogenicity [15]. Cytochrome P450 (CYP1A) induction serves as a key biomarker of exposure, while excessive ROS generation disrupts mitochondrial integrity and induces apoptosis. Figure 12 schematically represents the molecular mechanism underlying BaP-induced carcinogenesis in Tilapia zillii.

Ecological and Human Health Continuum

The ecological implications extend beyond individual fish health to population-level declines, altered reproductive success, and disruption of aquatic food webs as shown in Figure 13. Bioaccumulation and biomagnification of PAHs in higher trophic levels may further intensify human exposure risk through dietary transfer. This continuum between ecological degradation and human health outcomes necessitates an integrative management model emphasizing ecosystem health as a determinant of community wellbeing [62].

Conclusions

The study revealed pronounced bioaccumulation of aliphatic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Tilapia zillii inhabiting the Escravos River, with gill and muscle tissues showing the highest total hydrocarbon loads. The accumulation pattern reflects organ-specific exposure and lipid affinity, with strong correlations between PAH concentrations and oxidative stress biomarkers such as CYP1A, EROD, SOD, CAT, and MDA. These biochemical responses confirm the activation of detoxification and antioxidant defense pathways, indicating sublethal stress and potential genotoxicity induced by chronic hydrocarbon exposure. Monte Carlo uncertainty and sensitivity analyses further established ingestion as the dominant exposure route, with carcinogenic risk indices exceeding acceptable limits for both adults and children. Comparisons with other oil-polluted regions emphasize that the Escravos River exhibits relatively severe contamination, reinforcing its classification as a high-risk environment within the Niger Delta. The ecological implications extend beyond individual fish health to potential food web disruption and human dietary exposure risks. The mechanistic interpretation demonstrates that hydrocarbon-induced oxidative stress, cytochrome P450 activation, and lipid peroxidation constitute the underlying toxicity pathways in Tilapia zillii. Effective environmental management will require integrated remediation, stringent enforcement of effluent regulations, and continuous biomonitoring using biochemical markers. The linkage between chemical burden, biological response, and human exposure shows the urgent need for environmental-based pollution control strategies that protect both aquatic life and public health.

Notes

Acknowledgement
The authors are grateful to the Department of Industrial Chemistry, Enugu State University of Science and Technology for providing an enabling environment for the successful conduct of an M.Sc. from which this paper has emanated
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
CRediT author statement
A.I.K.: Conceptualization, Methodology Writing-Original draft preparation, E. A.: Conceptualization, Methodology Writing-Original draft preparation, Supervision, Software, P. I. U.: Supervision, V. O. F.: Visualization, Investigation, H. O. A.: Visualization, Investigation

References

1. Iwu GI, Lajide L, Madu PC, Isah IA. Assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) profiles in heat-processed meat and fish: a study on health risk evaluation. Discover Food 2024;4(1):46 https://doi.org/10.1007/s44187-024-00116-5.
crossref
2. Udofia US, Ameh C, Miller E, Ekpenyong MS. Investigating the origin and tissue concentration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in seafood and health risk in Niger Delta, Nigeria. Environ Sci Process Impacts 2021;23(11):1803-1814 https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EM00249J.
crossref pmid
3. Okoye ON, Ijoma IK, Okeke DO. Health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in common food crops within and outside selected mining areas of Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Sci Rep 2025;15(1):24982 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87623-2.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Agboeze E, Ogbobe O, Udeozo I, Ofordile VA, Nsude O, Eze C, et al. Heavy metal contamination and health risks from dumpsite effluents in Enugu State southeastern Nigeria. Environ Anal Health Toxicol 2025;40(3):41-53 https://doi.org/10.5620/eaht.2025023.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Agboeze E, Agboeze H, Udeozo TO, Ofordile VA. Environmental and health risk assessment of zinc, copper, iron, and cadmium in soil and food crops at Enugu State dumpsite. J Niger Soc Phys Sci 2025;7(4):54-71 https://doi.org/10.46481/jnsps.2026.3033.
crossref
6. Ajah DN, Agboeze E, Ihedioha JN, Chukwudi-Madu E, Chime CC. Levels of zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), and cadmium (Cd) in soil, rice stalk, and Oryza sativa grain in Ishiagu rice field, Ebonyi State, Nigeria; human health risk. J Niger Soc Phys Sci 2022;4(4):891-891 https://doi.org/10.46481/jnsps.2022.891.
crossref
7. Nsonwu-Anyanwu AC, Helal M, Khaled A, Elnemr A, Ejemot-Nwadiaro RI, Usoro CAO, et al. Urinary biomonitoring and cancer risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure in relation to water intake in Calabar, Nigeria. Expos Health 2025;17: 875-886 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-025-00704-5.
crossref
8. US Environmental Protection Agency. Priority pollutant list and toxicity identification evaluation guidance. Washington (DC): USEPA; 2020.

9. Onyena AP, Nkwoji JA, Chukwu LO, Walker TR, Sam K. Risk assessment of sediment PAH, BTEX, and emerging contaminants in Chanomi Creek Niger Delta, Nigeria. Environ Monit Assess 2023;195(9):1080 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11703-x.
crossref pmid
10. Shahid S, Sultana T, Sultana S, Hussain B, Al-Ghanim KA, Al-Bashir F, et al. Detecting aquatic pollution using histological investigations of the gills, liver, kidney, and muscles of Oreochromis niloticus. Toxics 2022;10(10):564 https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10100564.
crossref pmid pmc
11. Janska M, Tomaniova M, Hajšlová J, Kocourek V. Optimization of the procedure for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their derivatives in fish tissue: estimation of measurements uncertainty. Food Addit Contam 2006;23(3):309-325 https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030500401207.
crossref pmid
12. Fadare OO, Lascelles N, Myers J, Gray A, Conkle JL. Sorption, extraction, and characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in environmentally weathered microplastics, particulate organic matter, sediment, and fish species in the Lavaca-Matagorda Bay system. Environ Health 2025;3(6):690-700 https://doi.org/10.1021/envhealth.4c00223.
crossref pmid pmc
13. Xu Y, Hu Y, Lan H, Zhang J, Gao Y, Deng S. Comparative analysis of quality and flavor profiles in raw and pre-cooked large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) meat post freezing and reheating. Food Chem 2025;464: 141865 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141865.
crossref pmid
14. Matos B, Bramatti I, Santos CD, Branco V, Martins M. Multi-biomarker analysis of sub-chronic PAH mixture effects in fish at environmentally relevant levels. Aquat Toxicol 2025;283: 107350 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2025.107350.
crossref pmid
15. Anyanwu IN, Sikoki FD, Semple KT. Risk assessment of PAHs and N-PAH analogues in sediment cores from the Niger Delta. Mar Pollut Bull 2020;161: 111684 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111684.
pmid
16. Farhan FJ, Saleh SM, Shnaishel AR, Hantoush AA, Alhello AA, Al-Saad HT, et al. Sources of total petroleum hydrocarbons in mussel of Unio tigris at Tigris River at Maysan Governorate in Iraq. Egypt J Aquat Biol Fish 2025;29(2):579-588 [cited 2026 Mar 9]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389738616_Sources_of_Total_Petroleum_Hydrocarbons_in_Mussel_of_Unio_tigris_at_Tigris_River_at_Maysan_Governorate_in_Iraq.
crossref
17. Edo GI, Samuel PO, Oloni GO, Ezekiel VO, Obasohan P, Agbo JJ. Environmental persistence, bioaccumulation, and ecotoxicology of heavy metals. Chem Ecol 2024;40(3):322-349 https://doi.org/10.1080/02757540.2024.2306839.
crossref
18. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Off J Eur Union 2006;Dec. 20. L364: 5-24.

19. Onyegeme-Okerenta BM, West OL, Chuku LC. Concentration, dietary exposure and human health risk assessment of total petroleum and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in seafood from coastal communities in Rivers State, Nigeria. Sci Afr 2022;16: e01186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01186.
crossref
20. Emoyoma UO, Ezejiofor AN, Frazzoli C, Bocca B, Ekhator OC, Onyena AP, et al. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in fish (fresh and dried) and public health in Nigeria: a systematic review. Int J Environ Health Res 2024;34(5):2197-2212 https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2023.2241416.
crossref pmid
21. Kim Y, Hong S, Jun L, Lee Y, Kim M, Yim UH, et al. Use of molecular composition and compound-specific isotope analysis for source appointment of PAHs in sediments of a highly industrialized area. Environ Pollut 2023;337: 122546 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122546.
crossref
22. Bukowska B, Mokra K, Michałowicz J. Benzo[a]pyrene-environmental occurrence, human exposure, and mechanisms of toxicity. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23(11):6348 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116348.
crossref pmid pmc
23. Dimatteo M, Di Napoli E, Paciello O, d’Aquino I, Iaccarino D, D’amore M, et al. Pathological changes and CYP1A1 expression as biomarkers of pollution in Sarpa salpa and Diplodus sargus. Animals 2024;14(21):3160 https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14213160.
crossref pmid pmc
24. Van der Oost R, Beyer J, Vermeulen NP. Fish bioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk assessment: a review. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 2003;13(2):57-149 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1382-6689(02)00126-6.
crossref pmid
25. Lee JH, Kang JC, Kim JH. Toxic effects of microplastic (polyethylene) on fish: accumulation, hematological parameters and antioxidant responses in Korean bullhead, Pseudobagrus fulvidraco. Sci Total Environ 2023;877: 162874 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162874.
crossref pmid
26. Abdallah SM, Muhammed RE, Mohamed RE, El Daous H, Saleh DM, Ghorab MA, et al. Assessment of biochemical biomarkers and environmental stress indicators in some freshwater fish. Environ Geochem Health 2024;46(11):464-482 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-024-02226-6.
crossref pmid pmc
27. Correia AT, Motta E, Daniel D, Nunes B, Neves J. Ecotoxicological effects of environmentally relevant concentrations of nickel nanoparticles on aquatic organisms from three trophic levels: insights from oxidative stress biomarkers. J Xenobiot 2025;15(4):112-131 https://doi.org/10.3390/jox15040112.
crossref pmid pmc
28. Suresh A, Soman V, KR A, Rahman K H. Sources, toxicity, fate and transport of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the aquatic environment: a review. Environ Forensics 2025;26(1):35-57 https://doi.org/10.1080/15275922.2024.2366801.
crossref
29. Rabuffetti G, Brola J, Pérez D, Somoza GM, Carriquiriborde P. EROD activity in the native fish Cnesterodon decemmaculatus as a biomarker for assessing aquatic pollution by AhR agonist chemicals within the Rio de la Plata basin. Sci Total Environ 2024;947: 174721 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174721.
crossref pmid
30. Ibor OR, Adeogun AO, Regoli F, Arukwe A. Xenobiotic biotransformation, oxidative stress and obesogenic molecular biomarker responses in Tilapia guineensis from Eleyele Lake, Nigeria. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2019;169: 255-265 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.11.021.
crossref pmid
31. Sayed FA, Eid MH, El-Sherbeeny AM, Abdel-Gawad GI, Mohamed EA, Abukhadra MR. Environmental and health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and toxic elements in the red sea using Monte Carlo simulation. Sci Rep 2025;15(1):4122 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71547-4.
crossref
32. Gholami-Borujeni F, Sarvestani RA, Mortezazadeh F, Mohseni-Bandpei A, Nejatzadeh F, Niknejad H. Assessing health risks of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in cooked fish using Monte Carlo simulation: a global review and meta-analysis. J Environ Health Sci Eng 2024;22(2):425-438 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-024-00922-0.
crossref pmid pmc
33. Gao X, Han G, Liu J, Zhang S, Zeng J. Heavy metal accumulation and source apportionment in urban river under ecological restoration: relationships with land use and risk assessment based on Monte Carlo simulation. ACS Earth Space Chem 2023;7(3):642-652 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.3c00008.
crossref
34. Oros A, Coatu V, Damir N, Danilov D, Ristea E, Lazar L. Molecular mechanisms and biomarker-based early-warning indicators of heavy metal toxicity in marine fish. Fishes 2025;10(7):339 https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10070339.
crossref
35. Sharma P, Chukwuka AV, Chatterjee S, Chakraborty D, Bhowmick S, Mistri TK, et al. Biomarker and adverse outcome pathway responses of Tubifex tubifex (sludge worm) exposed to environmentally-relevant levels of acenaphthene: insights from behavioral, physiological, and chemical structure–activity analyses. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2024;31(52):61894-61911 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-35290-7.
crossref pmid
36. Yüksel B, Ustaoğlu F, Topaldemir H, Yazman MM, Tokatlı C. Unveiling the nutritional value and potentially toxic elements in fish species from Miliç Wetland, Türkiye: a probabilistic human health risk assessment using Monte Carlo simulation. Mar Pollut Bull 2025;211: 117417 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.117417.
crossref pmid
37. Zeng Y, Song Z, Song G, Li S, Sun H, Zhang C, et al. Oxidative stress and antioxidant biomarker responses in fish exposed to heavy metals: a review. Environ Monit Assess 2025;197(8):1-25 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-14376-w.
crossref pmid
38. Turan F, Yilmaz MB, Yola ML, Ergenler A, Ilgaz NS, Oksuz H. Bioaccumulation of trace metals and genotoxicity responses in Liza aurata as an indicator of industrial pollution. Ecotoxicology 2022;31(9):1390-1402 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-022-02591-x.
crossref pmid
39. Ogunwole GA, Abiya SE, Amaeze NH, Eze CT. Antioxidant markers in gills, liver and muscle tissue of the African sharptooth catfish (Clarias gariepinus) exposed to subchronic levels of ibuprofen and dibutyl phthalate. Sci Afr 2021;12: e00816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00816.
crossref
40. Chukwuka AV, Jerome FC, Hassan A, Ebonwu B, Adeogun AO. Redox-active metals and oxidative stress–mediated myopathies in Callinectes amnicola, blue crab populations from impacted sites of the Lagos Lagoon: inferences for adverse ecological outcomes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2023;30(50):108565-108581 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29912-9.
crossref pmid
41. Donald CE, Sørhus E, Perrichon P, Nakken CL, Goksøyr A, Jørgensen KB, et al. Co-exposure of phenanthrene and the cyp-inducer 3-methylchrysene leads to altered biotransformation and increased toxicity in fish egg and larvae. Environ Sci Technol 2023;57(30):11022-11031 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c02770.
crossref pmid
42. Livingstone DR, O'hara SCM, Frettsome A, Rundle J. Contaminant-mediated pro-/antioxidant processes and oxidative damage in early life stages of fish. Environment and animal development. London: Garland Science; 2024. p. 173-201.

43. Oyibo JN, Wegwu MO, Uwakwe AA, Osuoha JO. Analysis of total petroleum hydrocarbons, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and risk assessment of heavy metals in some selected finfishes at Forcados terminal, Delta state, Nigeria. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manag 2018;9: 128-135 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2017.11.002.
crossref
44. Alshemmari H. An overview of persistent organic pollutants along the coastal environment of Kuwait. Open Chem 2021;19(1):149-156 https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2021-0198.
crossref
45. Wang H, Huang X, Kuang Z, Zheng X, Yang J, Huang H, et al. Source apportionment and human health risk of PAHs accumulated in edible marine organisms: a perspective of “source-organism-human”. J Hazard Mater 2023;453: 131372 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131372.
crossref
46. Ezugwu AL, Agbasi JC, Egbueri JC, Abugu HO, Aralu CC, Ucheana IA, et al. Mechanism, formation and transport of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in fruits, vegetables and fresh fish species in Africa: a systematic review of its health risk. Chem Afr 2024;7(5):2321-2344 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42250-024-00926-1.
crossref
47. Filatova TS, Abramochkin DV. Physiological effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in fish organisms. Mosc Univ Biol Sci Bull 2023;78(3):115-127 https://doi.org/10.3103/S0096392523700013.
crossref
48. Lin F, Li Y, Lin L, Yuan K, Yang L, Huang Y, et al. Spatiotemporal variations of halogenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments of Pearl River Estuary: occurrence, sources, and potential ecological risks. Mar Pollut Bull 2026;222: 118722 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118722.
crossref pmid
49. Carvalho JR, de Queiroz Rocha D, Carvalho FC, Alves ACN, da Silva Liebl AR, Oliveira ATD, et al. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons contamination in Amazonian environments: a systematic review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2025;32: 22238-22254 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36934-y.
crossref pmid
50. Okoye EA, Bocca B, Ruggieri F, Ezejiofor AN, Nwaogazie IL, Domingo JL, et al. Concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in samples of soil, feed and food collected in the Niger delta region, Nigeria: a probabilistic human health risk assessment. Environ Res 2021;202: 111619 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111619.
crossref pmid
51. Neff JM. Bioaccumulation in marine organisms: effects of contaminants from oil well produced water. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers; 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008043716-3/50002-6.

52. Arojojoye OA, Oyagbemi AA, Ola-Davies OE, Asaolu RO, Shittu ZO, Hassan BA, et al. Assessment of water quality of selected rivers in the Niger delta region of Nigeria using biomarkers in Clarias gariepinus. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2021;28(18):22936-22943 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11879-6.
crossref
53. González-Soto N, Campos L, Navarro E, Bilbao E, Guilhermino L, Cajaraville MP, et al. Effects of microplastics alone or with sorbed oil compounds from the water accommodated fraction of a North Sea crude oil on marine mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis). Sci Total Environ 2022;851: 157999 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157999.
crossref pmid
54. Abdallah SM, Muhammed RE, Mohamed RE, El Daous H, Saleh DM, Ghorab MA, et al. Assessment of biochemical biomarkers and environmental stress indicators in some freshwater fish. Environ Geochem Health 2024;46(11):464 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-024-02226-6.
crossref pmid pmc
55. Zarei S, Ghafouri H, Vahdatiraad L, Heidari B, Sohrabi T. Enhancing resistance and cell survival in Acipenser ruthenus liver, gill, and kidney cells: the potential of heat shock protein inducers against PAH-benzo [a] pyrene stress. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2024;31(6):9445-9460 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-31884-3.
crossref pmid
56. Lewis JP, Tarnecki JH, Garner SB, Chagaris DD, Patterson WF III. Changes in reef fish community structure following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Sci Rep 2020;10(1):5621 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62574-y.
crossref pmid pmc
57. Akinpelumi VK, Ossai CM, Abdulai PM, Onyena AP, Nwanaforo E, Obasi CN, et al. Human health risk assessment of arsenic and heavy metals in seafood harvested from crude oil impacted community in Niger delta, Nigeria. Thalassas 2025;41(3):165 https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-025-00927-y.
crossref
58. Zhang J, Chan KKJ, Chan W. Synergistic interaction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, phthalate esters, or phenol on DNA adduct formation by aristolochic acid I: insights into the etiology of Balkan endemic nephropathy. Chem Res Toxicol 2022;35(5):849-857 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00026.
crossref pmid
59. Anyanwu IN, Beggel S, Sikoki FD, Okuku EO, Unyimadu JP, Geist J. Pollution of the Niger delta with total petroleum hydrocarbons, heavy metals and nutrients in relation to seasonal dynamics. Sci Rep 2023;13(1):14079 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40995-9.
crossref
60. Gupta S, Gupta SK. Application of Monte Carlo simulation for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks assessment through multi-exposure pathways of heavy metals of river water and sediment, India. Environ Geochem Health 2023;45(6):3465-3486 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-022-01421-7.
crossref pmid
61. Hu W, Yang J. Effect of ambient ozone pollution on disease burden globally: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Sci Total Environ 2024;926: 171739 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171739.
crossref pmid
62. Habeebullah SFK, Al Said T, Alagarsamy S, Ahamed N, Martinez K, Abusam A, et al. Pollution dynamics in the first marine protected area of the northwestern Arabian gulf: environmental assessment and management implications. Environ Pollut 2025;369: 125856 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.125856.
crossref pmid
63. Benford D, Boobis A, Cantrill R, Cressey P, Dessipri E, Kabadi SV, et al. Contributions of the joint FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives to international food safety: celebrating the 100th meeting of the committee. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 2025;160: 105833 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105833.
crossref pmid

Figure 1.
Map of the study area in Delta State, Nigeria, showing the Escravos River sampling location.
eaht-41-1-e2026008f1.jpg
Figure 2.
Total aliphatic hydrocarbon concentration (mg/kg)
eaht-41-1-e2026008f2.jpg
Figure 3.
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Content (mg/kg)
eaht-41-1-e2026008f3.jpg
Figure 4.
Comparative bar chart and Relative abundance of low molecular weight (LMW) and high molecular weight (HMW) polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): (a) Comparative bar chart showing total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (ΣPAHs) concentrations in muscle, liver, kidney, and gill tissues of Tilapia zillii collected from the Escravos River. Muscle exhibited 313.43 ± 0.67 mg/kg highest PAH burden followed by kidney and liver, while gill showed the lowest accumulation; (b). Relative abundance of low molecular weight (LMW) and high molecular weight (HMW) polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in muscle, liver, kidney, and gill tissues of Tilapia zillii collected from the Escravos River. Gill tissues show higher accumulation of LMW PAHs, while muscle and liver are dominated by HMW compounds, indicating source-specific bioaccumulation patterns.
eaht-41-1-e2026008f4.jpg
Figure 5.
Tissue-specific accumulation of total petroleum hydrocarbons (ΣTPH = ΣTAH + ΣPAHs) in Tilapia zillii, illustrating organ-dependent pollutant retention capacity, with muscle showing the highest accumulation followed by kidney and liver.
eaht-41-1-e2026008f5.jpg
Figure 6.
Monte Carlo simulation output showing the probabilistic distribution of excess lifetime cancer risk (ECR) from benzo(a)pyrene exposure via consumption of Tilapia zillii muscle tissue (n = 10,000 iterations). The vertical red dashed line denotes the 95th percentile (1.28 × 10⁻³), which exceeds the USEPA threshold of 1 × 10⁻⁴, indicating an elevated carcinogenic risk among high-end consumers.
eaht-41-1-e2026008f6.jpg
Figure 7.
Sensitivity analysis of key exposure parameters influencing Monte Carlo simulation output. BaP concentration and fish ingestion rate contributed most significantly to model variance, demonstrating their dominant role in overall carcinogenic risk estimation.
eaht-41-1-e2026008f7.jpg
Figure 8.
illustrates a comparative plot of ΣPAHs across global regions, highlighting Escravos River as a contamination hotspot within the Gulf of Guinea basin.
eaht-41-1-e2026008f8.jpg
Figure 9.
Comparative assessment of dietary PAH exposure from Tilapia zillii in Escravos River relative to global dietary benchmarks (FAO/WHO and EFSA limits). Elevated ECR values indicate potential dietary carcinogenic risk.
eaht-41-1-e2026008f9.jpg
Figure 10.
Framework for continuous environmental monitoring integrating chemical, biological, and computational approaches for sustainable risk management in oil-impacted ecosystems.
eaht-41-1-e2026008f10.jpg
Figure 11.
Relationship between accumulated PAH concentrations in Tilapia zillii tissues and corresponding oxidative stress biomarkers, demonstrating dose–response linkage between chemical exposure and biological effect.
eaht-41-1-e2026008f11.jpg
Figure 12.
Proposed mechanistic pathway of BaP-induced toxicity in Tilapia zillii, showing CYP1A-mediated metabolic activation, ROS generation, oxidative damage, and DNA adduct formation.
eaht-41-1-e2026008f12.jpg
Figure 13.
Conceptual continuum linking ecosystem contamination, fish health, and human exposure in oil-polluted environments, emphasizing the need for holistic risk management.
eaht-41-1-e2026008f13.jpg
Table 1.
Concentration (Mean ± SE) of Total Aliphatic Hydrocarbon Components (n-Alkanes, mg/kg) in Organs of Tilapia zillii from the Escravos River
Component Muscle Gill Liver Kidney Min Max p-value
Octane (C8) 144.33 ± 0.46 BDL 56.25 ± 0.31 78.17 ± 0.03 55.52 149.45 P < 0.05
Nonane (C9) 1946.70 ± 0.03 2155.49 ± 0.44 697.29 ± 0.21 869.02 ± 0.41 658.25 2210.80 P < 0.05
Undecane (C11) 310.37 ± 0.05 303.22 ± 0.32 215.32 ± 0.14 198.58 ± 0.18 185.08 310.37 P < 0.05
Dodecane (C12) 80.05 ± 0.32 71.95 ± 0.01 86.33 ± 0.02 88.03 ± 0.12 70.18 90.12 P < 0.05
Tridecane (C13) 86.92 ± 0.33 157.98 ± 0.21 64.08 ± 0.16 65.02 ± 0.28 64.08 159.36 P < 0.05
Pentadecane (C15) 119.13 ± 0.22 63.05 ± 0.30 60.87 ± 0.04 57.54 ± 0.11 55.97 120.54 P < 0.05
Hexadecane (C16) 300.92 ± 0.30 413.82 ± 0.21 287.96 ± 0.18 301.54 ± 0.33 287.02 418.69 P < 0.05
Pristane 398.69 ± 0.15 327.69 ± 0.35 348.77 ± 0.14 289.67 ± 0.13 288.03 399.87 P < 0.05
Hexacosane (C26) 596.29 ± 0.12 693.02 ± 0.03 478.98 ± 0.19 357.48 ± 0.17 354.55 693.02 P < 0.05
Tetratriacontane (C34) 797.46 ± 0.12 1230.76 ± 0.44 258.39 ± 0.08 143.54 ± 0.33 143.07 1230.76 P < 0.05
Tetracontane (C40) 165.63 ± 0.24 789.82 ± 0.05 136.81 ± 0.02 188.93 ± 0.18 134.84 790.17 P < 0.05
ΣTAHs 9302.33 ± 1.08 10388.16 ± 0.98 6270.64 ± 0.85 5980.56 ± 1.20 5978.00 10390.00 P < 0.05

1 BDL = Below Detection Limit; SE = Standard Error.

Table 2.
Biomarker Enzyme Activities in Tilapia zillii from Escravos River (Mean ± SD)
Biomarker Enzyme Tissue Control (Unexposed) Exposed (Escravos River) % Change Correlation with ΣPAHs (r) Significance (p < 0.05)
CYP1A (pmol min⁻¹ mg⁻¹ protein) Liver 125 ± 8.3 287 ± 15.4 +129% 0.86 *
EROD (pmol resorufin min⁻¹ mg⁻¹ protein) Gill 47.5 ± 3.2 112.4 ± 8.1 +137% 0.81 *
SOD (U mg⁻¹ protein) Liver 38.6 ± 2.5 22.1 ± 1.9 −43% −0.77 *
CAT (µmol H₂O₂ min⁻¹ mg⁻¹ protein) Kidney 52.3 ± 4.2 29.7 ± 3.1 −43% −0.72 *
MDA (nmol mg⁻¹ protein) Liver 1.42 ± 0.08 3.11 ± 0.12 +119% 0.88 *

2 Values represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 6 per group). Statistical significance assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (*p < 0.05).

Table 3.
Mean (± SE) Concentration of PAHs in Organs of Tilapia zillii (mg/kg)
PAH Compound Muscle (mg/kg) Gill (mg/kg) Liver (mg/kg) Kidney (mg/kg) Min–Max (mg/kg)
Naphthalene 4.32 ± 0.12 3.06 ± 0.11 3.54 ± 0.01 7.36 ± 0.05 2.85–8.33
Acenaphthylene 11.08 ± 0.33 3.86 ± 0.25 4.54 ± 0.02 4.26 ± 0.14 3.20–12.09
Acenaphthene 7.70 ± 0.14 26.32 ± 0.03 15.34 ± 0.12 8.26 ± 0.11 7.52–26.77
Fluorene 7.37 ± 0.18 2.96 ± 0.15 3.69 ± 0.30 4.65 ± 0.25 2.47–8.30
Phenanthrene 3.98 ± 0.02 9.99 ± 0.13 8.14 ± 0.12 7.77 ± 0.24 3.42–10.23
Anthracene 135.57 ± 0.33 85.12 ± 0.01 122.36 ± 0.33 129.39 ± 0.18 85.02–136.88
Fluoranthene 35.68 ± 0.21 7.58 ± 0.11 26.36 ± 0.31 13.26 ± 0.22 6.55–36.09
Pyrene 16.51 ± 0.33 8.25 ± 0.02 8.87 ± 0.05 12.22 ± 0.04 8.25–17.87
Chrysene 3.32 ± 0.25 6.15 ± 0.14 3.95 ± 0.12 8.69 ± 0.13 3.08–8.94
Benz(a)anthracene 6.78 ± 0.17 2.69 ± 0.54 5.37 ± 0.19 4.23 ± 0.08 2.33–7.45
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 3.76 ± 0.24 4.90 ± 0.20 4.09 ± 0.27 5.64 ± 0.17 3.24–6.80
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 3.95 ± 0.18 3.76 ± 0.18 14.02 ± 0.24 12.08 ± 0.31 3.47–12.66
Benzo(a)pyrene 20.95 ± 0.32 3.12 ± 0.11 7.14 ± 0.08 16.65 ± 0.11 2.85–21.12
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 36.33 ± 0.44 14.17 ± 0.30 24.56 ± 0.15 18.21 ± 0.36 13.18–38.02
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 8.94 ± 0.14 6.08 ± 0.22 6.23 ± 0.11 7.09 ± 0.09 5.54–9.30
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 7.10 ± 0.17 4.90 ± 0.05 7.89 ± 0.01 6.88 ± 0.05 4.80–7.95
ΣPAH (mg/kg) 313.43 ± 0.67 192.96 ± 0.45 266.17 ± 0.81 266.72 ± 0.36 192.96–318.02
Table 4.
Estimated Human Health Risk Metrics from PAHs in Tilapia zillii Tissues
Tissue EDI (mg/kg/day) HQ (unitless) TEQ (mg/kg) ELCR (unitless) Risk Level
Muscle 0.0127 42.3 1.14 9.27 × 10⁻⁴ High
Liver 0.0108 36.0 0.96 7.89 × 10⁻⁴ High
Kidney 0.0109 36.3 1.01 8.00 × 10⁻⁴ High
Gill 0.0079 26.3 0.62 5.85 × 10⁻⁴ Moderate–High

4 Assumptions: Fish consumption rate: 36.4 g/person/day, Body weight: 60 kg, Oral cancer slope factor for benzo[a]pyrene = 0.0073 mg/kg/day⁻¹, TEQ calculated based on BaP equivalents using Nisbet and LaGoy (1992) TEFs.

Editorial Office
Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University
145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea
E-mail: envitoxic@gmail.com
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © 2026 by The Korean Society of Environmental Health and Toxicology & Korea Society for Environmental Analysis.     Developed in M2PI