AbstractThis study evaluated the effectiveness of smoke-free legislation in reducing indoor air pollutants, specifically PM2.5, NO₂, and TVOC, in recreational facilities in Korea. A quasi-experimental before-and-after study was conducted in selected indoor venues, with pollutant levels compared pre- and post-designation of non-smoking areas. Monitoring was performed in three billiard halls and three screen golf ranges in Seoul. PM2.5, NO₂, and TVOC were measured using a Grimm 1.108 aerosol spectrometer (Germany), MEZUS-210/ANA-2 and Teledyne M200E (Korea/USA), and a Sibata MP-Σ30 sampler (Japan). Sampling occurred during operating hours, and results were analyzed using non-parametric tests against Korean standards. After implementation, PM2.5 decreased from 42.8 to 18.6 μg/m³, and NO₂ from 148.3 to 57.9 μg/m³, though reductions were not statistically significant. TVOC showed the clearest improvement, falling significantly from 29.2 to 18.4 ppb (p < 0.01). Smoke-free policies substantially reduced indoor pollutants, particularly TVOC, in recreational facilities. While PM2.5 and NO₂ declines were less consistent, the results highlight both the benefits of smoke-free laws and the need for complementary interventions such as improved ventilation and continuous monitoring.
IntroductionTobacco smoke contains more than 7,000 chemicals and about 70 identified carcinogens [1]. These tobacco components include nicotine, 3-EP, respiratory dust, etc. as indicators representing the level of exposure to cigarette smoke caused by secondhand smoke (SHS) [2]. SHS refers to involuntary exposure to cigarette smoke and can cause a type of health effect similar to direct smoking [3]. SHS is associated with the development of neurological diseases including cardiovascular diseases and stroke, starting with respiratory diseases, which are the routes of exposure, including lung cancer [4-6]. One of the most widely used methods to reduce exposure to cigarette smoke from SHS in public places is the implementation of smoking cessation policies [7]. There have been reports of 86%-91% reduction in PM2.5 concentrations in the United States and Europe after smoking cessation policies were implemented in places such as restaurants, bars, and bowling alleys [8, 9].
Korea's policy on smoking cessation in public places is being implemented through the National Health Promotion Act. Article 9, Paragraph 4 of the National Health Promotion Act lists the facilities that should designate the entire facility as a non-smoking area and install a sign announcing the non-smoking area, including the Internet game room. This smoking cessation policy was gradually strengthened starting with the distinction between smoking and non-smoking areas in 2003, and from January 1, 2014, it included full-scale smoking cessation [10]. In the recent revision, Article 9, Paragraph 4 of the National Health Promotion Act included sports facilities installed indoors among sports facilities corresponding to the sports facility business, and this policy came into force from December 3, 2017. Among these indoor sports facilities, places where smoking has been frequent include indoor golf practice and billiard room businesses [10].
In Korea, studies on the effectiveness evaluation of public facilities in relation to smoking cessation policies have been conducted primarily in PC cafes and restaurants, with limited evaluation of other indoor public places. Exposure to these common indoor air pollutants, such as Total Volatile Organic Compounds (TVOC), can cause eye, nose, and throat irritation, headaches, and damage to various organs, while Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) is known to cause respiratory inflammation and exacerbate existing conditions like asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Furthermore, Particulate Matter (PM2.5), due to its small size, penetrates deeply into the lungs and is strongly linked to long-term cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, including lung cancer [11]. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the TVOC, NO₂, PM2.5 concentration level before and after the smoking cessation policy was implemented for billiard halls and screen golf ranges in Seoul.
Materials and MethodsFacility types and monitoring designThe study targeted two categories of indoor leisure facilities prevalent in urban Korea: billiard halls and screen golf ranges. Both facility types are characterized by prolonged occupant stay times, limited natural ventilation, and potential pollutant sources such as tobacco smoke, building materials, and cleaning agents. Facilities were selected to represent typical small-to-medium-sized operations, with floor areas ranging from approximately 150 to 350 m², located in mixed-use commercial buildings. A total of three billiard halls and three screen golf ranges were monitored. To ensure a representative sample of indoor sports facilities in Seoul, a total of six venues—three billiard halls and three screen golf ranges—were selected from three distinct administrative districts within Seoul. The selection process was based on non-probabilistic sampling, targeting venues that were willing to participate in the quasi-experimental before-and-after monitoring study. The facilities were chosen to reflect the typical operational characteristics and size common to urban commercial areas in Seoul. The monitored facilities are considered representative of the general environment of similar indoor sports venues in the city. Measurements were conducted before and after the designation of non-smoking areas under the National Health Promotion Act, enabling a quasi–before–after comparative study design. Within each facility, sampling was performed at a central location in the main activity area, positioned away from direct ventilation outlets, windows, and localized pollutant-emitting appliances to ensure representative indoor air sampling. During each sampling session, TVOC, NO₂, and PM₂.₅ were measured concurrently using calibrated instruments (Table 1). Monitoring was performed over multiple days to account for operational variability and was conducted during typical business hours (14:00–22:00) to capture peak occupancy periods. In addition, outdoor temperature, relative humidity, and qualitative observations of occupant activity were recorded to aid in interpreting the variability of indoor pollutant levels.
Sampling timeline in relation to smoke-free policyTo ensure a clear temporal relationship with the smoke-free policy, the sampling timeline was precisely structured. The policy mandating smoke-free indoor sports facilities, including billiard halls and screen golf ranges, officially took effect on December 3, 2017. The pre-designation (Before) sampling was conducted in a quasi-experimental design during September to November 2017, which was prior to the policy's effective date. The post-designation (After) sampling was subsequently conducted in September 2018, approximately 9 to 10 months after the policy implementation, thereby allowing adequate time for the policy to be fully enforced and for changes in smoking behavior and air quality to manifest.
Sampling and analysisIndoor air quality measurements were conducted in selected billiard halls and screen golf ranges before and after the designation of non-smoking areas. Three target pollutants—TVOC, NO₂, and PM₂.₅—were measured following standardized protocols. For TVOC, air samples were collected using a MP-Σ30 sampler (Sibata Co., South Korea) operated at a calibrated flow rate of 50–100 mL/min for a 30-minute period at each sampling location. Samples were captured in solid sorbent tubes and subsequently analyzed using gas chromatography. A split was made between the two detectors to fulfill both qualitative and quantitative requirements. A mass spectrometry (GC-MS) detector was employed for qualitative analysis (identification) of individual VOC species and their semi-quantitative determination. Concurrently, a flame ionization detector (GC-FID) was used for the accurate quantification of the aggregate TVOC concentration. The FID provides a stable and reliable response proportional to the total carbon mass, which is critical for quantifying TVOCs against a standard equivalent. For the TVOC analysis, the total concentration was quantified using the GC-FID signal and expressed as toluene equivalent, a standard methodology in ambient air quality assessment. The TVOC measurement included more than 50 individual VOC species (including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX)) ranging from C6 to C16, as determined by the initial GC-MS identification sweeps. The final TVOC concentration was calculated by summing the FID responses and converting the total area into a Toluene equivalent concentration (ppb). Rigorous quality assurance and quality control procedures were applied to both GC-MS and GC-FID analyses. Prior to analysis, all sampling tubes were conditioned with high-purity nitrogen. Calibration curves for both detectors were established using certified gas standards (e.g., Toluene for TVOC/FID; multi-component standards for individual VOCs/MS). Field blanks and laboratory blanks were analyzed for every batch of samples to ensure no cross-contamination. The Limits of Detection (LODs) were determined for all target compounds; the LOD for TVOC (Toluene Equivalent) via GC-FID was determined to be 1.0 ppb. For NO₂, measurements employed MEZUS-210 (KEMIK Co., South Korea), ANA-2 (Total Engineering Co. LTD, South Korea), and M200E (Teledyne Technologies, USA) instruments. Sampling was conducted for 60 minutes per site using the chemiluminescence method, in accordance with established atmospheric NO₂ monitoring standards. For PM₂.₅, real-time monitoring was performed using a Grimm 1.108 aerosol spectrometer (Grimm Aerosol Technik GmbH & Co. KG, Germany) at a flow rate of 2–7 mL/min over a 6-hour continuous measurement period. The gravimetric continuous monitoring method was applied to ensure high temporal resolution and accuracy. All instruments were calibrated according to the manufacturers’ specifications before deployment. Measurements were performed at breathing-zone height (1.2–1.5 m) and under typical operating conditions of the facilities. Environmental parameters, including indoor temperature and relative humidity, were concurrently recorded to support interpretation of pollutant variability.
Statistical analysisStatistical analyses were performed using Python 3.11 (Python Software Foundation, Wilmington, DE, USA). Descriptive statistics, including the mean ± standard deviation (SD), median, and range, were calculated for TVOC, NO₂, and PM₂.₅, stratified by facility type and sampling period. The Shapiro–Wilk test was applied to assess data normality. Paired comparisons between pre- and post-designation measurements were conducted using the paired t-test for normally distributed variables or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for non-normally distributed variables. The proportion of samples exceeding the Korean Ministry of Environment indoor air quality guidelines (NO₂: 60 μg/m³; PM₂.₅: 35 μg/m³; no general TVOC standard) was compared using Fisher’s exact test. All statistical tests were two-tailed, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Table 2 presents the indoor air pollutant concentrations measured in billiard halls and screen golf ranges. For TVOC, the mean concentration was 23.8 ± 7.4 ppb, with a median of 17.5 ppb and a range of 12.0–40.0 ppb. NO2 concentrations averaged 103.1 ± 175.4 μg/m³, with a median of 35.7 μg/m³ and a range of 3.4–838.1 μg/m³. PM2.5 concentrations had a mean of 30.7 ± 25.1 μg/m³, a median of 20.7 μg/m³, and ranged from 5.1 to 119.8 μg/m³.
Measurements of TVOC, NO2, and PM2.5 were conducted in three billiard halls and three screen golf ranges before and after the designation of non-smoking areas (Table 3). In billiard halls, mean ± SD concentrations were 22.9 ± 5.2 ppb for TVOC (range: 12.0–40.0 ppb), 154.9 ± 200.4 μg/m³ for NO₂ (3.4–838.1 μg/m³), and 29.1 ± 14.0 μg/m³ for PM2.5 (5.5–60.3 μg/m³). Against Korean Ministry of Environment 24-h guidelines (NO₂: 60 μg/m³; PM2.5: 35 μg/m³; no general TVOC limit), exceedances occurred in 16.7 % of NO₂ samples and 66.7 % of PM2.5 samples; no TVOC exceedances were observed. In screen golf ranges, mean ± SD concentrations were 24.6 ± 4.3 ppb for TVOC (12.0–33.0 ppb), 51.3 ± 40.2 μg/m³ for NO₂ (15.6–166.3 μg/m³), and 32.4 ± 24.3 μg/m³ for PM2.5 (5.1–119.8 μg/m³). No TVOC or NO₂ samples exceeded guideline values, whereas 16.7 % of PM2.5 samples exceeded the 35 μg/m³ limit.
For the combined category of billiard halls and screen golf ranges, the mean ± SD concentration of TVOC decreased markedly from 29.2 ± 4.5 ppb (range: 21.0–40.0 ppb) before the designation of non-smoking areas to 18.4 ± 5.0 ppb (range: 12.0–29.0 ppb) after designation, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.01) (Table 4). Mean NO₂ concentrations declined from 148.3 ± 186.3 μg/m³ (range: 9.3–838.1 μg/m³) before designation to 57.9 ± 54.2 μg/m³ (range: 3.4–188.8 μg/m³) afterward; however, this reduction was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Similarly, PM2.5 levels decreased from 42.8 ± 29.4 μg/m³ (range: 6.9–119.8 μg/m³) to 18.6 ± 8.8 μg/m³ (range: 5.1–33.9 μg/m³) following the policy implementation, but the change did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05).
Fig. 1 presents the mean concentrations of TVOC, NO₂, and PM2.5 in billiard halls and screen golf ranges before and after the designation of non-smoking areas. For TVOC, both facility types exhibited a marked reduction after designation, with mean levels decreasing from 28.9 ppb to 17.9 ppb in billiard halls and from 30.5 ppb to 18.8 ppb in screen golf ranges. NO₂ concentrations were initially higher in billiard halls (245.7 μg/m³) compared to screen golf ranges (66.3 μg/m³). After designation, these levels declined to 72.3 μg/m³ and 48.2 μg/m³, respectively, with a greater relative reduction observed in billiard halls. Similarly, PM2.5 concentrations decreased following designation in both facility types, from 36.8 μg/m³ to 20.5 μg/m³ in billiard halls and from 48.6 μg/m³ to 16.7 μg/m³ in screen golf ranges.
DiscussionThe analysis of indoor air pollutants in billiard halls and screen golf ranges prior to and following the designation of non-smoking areas revealed distinct patterns across different pollutants. Although the mean concentrations of TVOC in both facility types (Table 3) were well below the Korean Ministry of Environment’s reference value for certain indoor facilities (~400 ppb), the observed ranges indicate substantial variability. This variability supports previous findings by Jang et al., [12] who reported that TVOC levels in hospitality environments can fluctuate considerably depending on ventilation conditions, occupant density, and smoking behaviors, even when official ventilation standards such as ASHRAE 62-1989 are met. In contrast, NO₂ levels in billiard halls before the implementation of non-smoking regulations averaged 148.3 ± 186.3 μg/m³, with a wide range (9.3–838.1 μg/m³), and 16.7 % of samples exceeded the Korean 24-h mean guideline value of 60 μg/m³ [13]. This contrasts with post-designation measurements (Table 3), which showed a reduction and no samples exceeding the guideline, suggesting that smoking bans can effectively lower NO₂ exposure. Meanwhile, PM2.5 concentrations decreased in both settings after the designation. However, despite the reductions, the proportion of PM2.5 samples exceeding the 24-h Korean standard of 35 μg/m³ [13-16] remained notable in both facility types. These results highlight that while policy interventions can significantly reduce certain pollutant levels, comprehensive measures, including improved ventilation and continuous monitoring, are essential to meet stringent indoor air quality targets.
The results in Table 3 indicate distinct patterns of indoor air pollutant concentrations between billiard halls and screen golf ranges. TVOC levels in both facility types were considerably lower than the facility-specific limits sometimes applied in Korea (≈400 ppb), suggesting that active smoking was not the sole determinant of VOC burden. Instead, these compounds are likely influenced by multiple non-tobacco sources, including building and furnishing materials, adhesives, cleaning products, and emissions from human activity. Such findings are consistent with earlier studies showing that VOC concentrations can vary widely depending on ventilation efficiency, occupancy rates, and indoor activities [17, 18].
The combined analysis of billiard halls and screen golf ranges revealed a substantial decline in TVOC concentrations from 29.2 ± 4.5 ppb before the designation of non-smoking areas to 18.4 ± 5.0 ppb afterward, representing a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.01) (Table 4). This magnitude of decrease is consistent with previous findings showing that smoking bans in hospitality and recreational venues can effectively reduce indoor VOC levels by limiting emissions from environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and related sources [18, 19]. The significant reduction in TVOC directly reflects the elimination of combustion byproducts, including specific volatile organic compounds and potentially semi-volatile organic compounds (such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, PAHs) associated with tobacco smoke particles. Given the lack of a specific South Korean regulatory standard for TVOC, the significance of this finding for policymakers lies in the observed relative change, which provides conclusive evidence that the policy successfully eliminated a major source of VOC pollution. Policymakers can interpret this result as strong validation for continued enforcement and use the post-intervention level as a baseline for future indoor air quality management. Although mean NO₂ levels decreased from 148.3 ± 186.3 μg/m³ to 57.9 ± 54.2 μg/m³ after implementation, the change was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Similar non-significant reductions have been observed in other post-ban studies, suggesting that factors such as outdoor infiltration, combustion appliances, and traffic-related emissions may limit the effect of smoking restrictions on NO₂ concentrations [13]. Likewise, PM2.5 levels decreased from 42.8 ± 29.4 μg/m³ to 18.6 ± 8.8 μg/m³, but without statistical significance (p > 0.05). While several studies have reported significant PM2.5 declines after smoking bans [14], our findings indicate that in some facilities, additional particulate sources—such as cooking, heating, and infiltration from outdoor air—may attenuate the measurable impact of policy interventions.
Fig. 1 illustrates the mean ± SD concentrations of TVOC, NO₂, and PM2.5 measured in billiard halls and screen golf ranges before and after the designation of non-smoking areas. Among the pollutants, TVOC exhibited the most substantial and statistically significant reduction; however, the considerable overlap in standard deviations indicates pronounced inter-facility variability. This heterogeneity is likely attributable to differences in ventilation system design and operation, maintenance practices, occupant density, and the contribution of non-smoking-related VOC sources such as cleaning agents, air fresheners, and off-gassing from building materials [20, 21]. The reduction in NO₂ concentrations did not reach statistical significance, which may be explained by its multiple sources. Beyond environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), indoor NO₂ levels can be substantially affected by outdoor infiltration from vehicular emissions, emissions from gas-fired appliances, and seasonal variations in ventilation rates [22, 23]. These findings suggest that smoking bans alone are insufficient to ensure compliance with NO₂ guidelines, and that additional measures—such as source elimination, enhanced ventilation strategies, and improved filtration—are required. For PM2.5, mean concentrations decreased following policy implementation; however, substantial inter-facility variability persisted. The high PM2.5 levels measured prior to the policy implementation were primarily attributed to active indoor smoking, which generates significant amounts of particulate matter. After the policy, residual PM2.5 concentrations were likely sustained by other facility-specific and environmental factors, including the generation of chalk dust from billiard cues and particle resuspension due to vigorous human movement, as well as the infiltration of outdoor air pollution, particularly fine dust, as these facilities typically do not utilize open-flame cooking or heating equipment. The continued occurrence of exceedances after the smoking ban highlights the necessity for a comprehensive indoor air quality (IAQ) management approach that integrates smoking restrictions with broader environmental and operational controls [24]. Overall, the results indicate a consistent reduction in pollutant concentrations across all measured parameters after the implementation of non-smoking policies, with the most pronounced improvements observed for TVOC and PM2.5.
This study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the findings. First, the sample size for both billiard halls and screen golf ranges was relatively small, which may limit the statistical power and generalizability of the results. Specifically, the findings should be interpreted cautiously as reflecting the immediate impact of the policy within the monitored facilities, and they may not fully represent the heterogeneity of ventilation or operational practices across all similar venues in Seoul. Future studies with a larger, more representative sample size across different regions and facility sizes would be necessary to establish broader generalizability. Second, measurements were conducted during a single season, precluding assessment of seasonal variability in pollutant concentrations; previous research has shown that factors such as heating practices, reduced ventilation rates in cold weather, and seasonal outdoor air quality changes (which strongly influence indoor NO2 and PM2.5 levels) can cause substantial seasonal fluctuations in indoor air pollutants. Third, a significant limitation lies in the uncontrolled nature of potential confounding factors. Although pollutant levels were measured before and after the policy, we did not perform a detailed, quantitative characterization of mechanical ventilation system parameters (e.g., air exchange rate or airflow) or collect quantitative data on occupant density or activity levels. Consequently, several potential confounders—including heterogeneity in ventilation effectiveness, changes in occupant-driven particle resuspension, cleaning practices, building maintenance, and influence from nearby outdoor pollution sources—were not systematically controlled, which may have attenuated or masked the true impact of the smoking restrictions on air quality. Finally, while the study focused on TVOC, NO₂, and PM2.5, other relevant indoor pollutants (e.g., CO, formaldehyde, ultrafine particles) were not measured, limiting the comprehensiveness of indoor air quality assessment. Furthermore, the aggregate nature of the TVOC measurement prevented the speciation and quantification of individual volatile compounds, thereby limiting our ability to conclusively identify which specific tobacco smoke constituents contributed most to the observed overall reduction. Future studies with larger sample sizes, year-round monitoring, and broader pollutant coverage are warranted to validate and expand upon these findings.
ConclusionsThis study evaluated indoor air quality in billiard halls and screen golf ranges, focusing on TVOC, NO₂, and PM2.5 concentrations before and after the designation of non-smoking areas. The results demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in TVOC levels following the policy implementation, suggesting that smoking-related emissions are a major source of VOCs in these venues. While reductions in NO₂ and PM2.5 concentrations were also observed, these changes were not statistically significant, indicating that other sources—such as outdoor infiltration, combustion appliances, cooking activities, and resuspension of settled particles—continue to influence indoor pollutant levels. These findings underscore the effectiveness of smoking bans in reducing certain indoor pollutants, particularly VOCs, but also highlight the need for comprehensive indoor air quality management strategies that include improved ventilation, source control, and regular maintenance. Future research efforts are warranted to fully address the limitations of this study and develop more robust, evidence-based interventions. Expanding pollutant monitoring to include additional chemical and particulate species is also essential to characterize the full health impact. We specifically prioritize the inclusion of ultrafine particles defined as particles smaller than 0.1 μg, as they are a more sensitive marker for ETS combustion than PM2.5, and carbon monoxide, a robust marker that would help differentiate between the pollutant contributions of smoking and vehicular emissions. Such comprehensive monitoring, combined with year-round, multi-season data collection and systematic control of ventilation parameters, is essential to definitively quantify the long-term effectiveness of smoke-free policies in complex urban environments.
NotesReferences1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. How tobacco smoke causes disease: the biology and behavioral basis for smoking-attributable disease: a report of the Surgeon General. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; Atlanta, GA: 2010. [cited 2025 Sep 07]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK53017/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK53017.pdf.
2. Eder W, Ege MJ, von Mutius E. The asthma epidemic. N Engl J Med 2006;355: 2226-2235 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra054308.
3. Hwang GS, Paik NW, Ha KC. A study on the concentrations of environmental tobacco smoke in PC game rooms in Seoul. Korean J Environ Health 2003;29(3):43-49 [cited 2025 Sep 07]. Available from: https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/landing/article.kci?arti_id=ART001016356.
4. Flor LS, Anderson JA, Ahmad N, Aravkin A, Carr S, Dai X, et al. Health effects associated with exposure to secondhand smoke: a Burden of Proof study. Nat Med 2024;30(4):1213 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-02832-y.
5. Pitsavos C, Panagiotakos DB, Chrysohoou C, Skoumas J, Tzioumis K, Stefanadis C, Toutouzas P. Association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and the development of acute coronary syndromes: the CARDIO2000 case-control study. Tob Control 2002;11(3):220-225 https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.11.3.220.
6. Brennan P, Buffler PA, Reynolds P, Wu AH, Wichmann HE, Agudo A, et al. Secondhand smoke exposure in adulthood and risk of lung cancer among never smokers: a pooled analysis of two large studies. Int J Cancer 2004;109(1):125-131 https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.11682.
7. Sturm JJ, Yeatts K, Loomis D. Effects of tobacco smoke exposure on asthma prevalence and medical care use in North Carolina middle school children. Am J Public Health 2004;94(2):308-313 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.2.308.
8. Suh MK. The recent international trends of smoke-free policies: Canada, Singapore, USA. Health Welfare Policy Forum 2011;(176): 72-79 https://doi.org/10.23062/2011.06.7.
9. Lee K, Hahn EJ, Pieper N, Okoli CT, Repace J, Troutman A. Differential impacts of smoke-free laws on indoor air quality. J Environ Health 2008;70(8):24-30 [cited 2025 Sep 07]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18468220/.
10. Semple S, Creely KS, Naji A, Miller BG, Ayres JG. Secondhand smoke levels in Scottish pubs: the effect of smoke-free legislation. Tob Control 2007;16(2):127-132 https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2006.018119.
11. Kim Y, Lee K, Kim SW. Comparison of PM2.5 concentrations before and after smoke-free policy in some indoor sports facilities in Seoul. J Environ Health Sci 2018;44(3):267-274 [cited 2025 Sep 07]. Available from: https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/landing/article.kci?arti_id=ART002357973.
12. Choi YH, Kim HJ, Sohn JR, Seo JH. Occupational exposure to VOCs and carbonyl compounds in beauty salons and health risks associated with it in South Korea. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2023;256: 114873 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114873.
13. Hu Y, Ji JS, Zhao B. Restrictions on indoor and outdoor NO₂ emissions to reduce disease burden for pediatric asthma in China: a modeling study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 2022;24: 100463 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100463.
14. Suh BS, Kim SH, Kim IS, Hur YY, Do SY, Kim JM. Study on the indoor–outdoor NO₂ levels and related factors in urban apartments. Korean J Prev Med 1997;30(3):609-622 [cited 2025 Sep 07]. Available from: https://www.jpmph.org/journal/view.php?number=360.
15. Hirpa S, Mdege ND, Argefa TG, Tefera Y, Kassa SA, Awuor W, et al. Second-hand tobacco smoke exposure: results of particulate matter (PM₂.₅) measurements at hospitality venues in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2024;21(8):1011 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21081011.
16. Tong M, Goodman N, Vardoulakis S. Impact of secondhand smoke on air quality in partially enclosed outdoor hospitality venues: a review. BMC Public Health 2024;24: 1872 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19394-w.
17. Jeon S, Lee H, Jo K, Park Y, Yoon W, Choi J. Concrete actions for improving indoor air quality in Korea: advancing public health for vulnerable populations. Atmosphere 2024;15(11):1389 https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111389.
18. Horvat T, Pehnec G, Jakovljević I. Volatile organic compounds in indoor air: sampling, determination, sources, health risk, and regulatory insights. Toxics 2025;13(5):344 https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13050344.
19. Cincinelli A, Martellini T. Indoor air quality and health. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14(11):1286 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14111286.
20. Repace J. Respirable particles and carcinogens in the air of Delaware hospitality venues before and after a smoking ban. J Occup Environ Med 2004;46(9):887-905 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000141644.69355.52.
21. Weschler CJ. Changes in indoor pollutants since the 1950s. Atmos Environ 2009;43(1):153-169 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.044.
22. Salonen H, Salthammer T, Morawska L. Human exposure to ozone in school and office indoor environments. Environ Int 2018;119: 503-514 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.012.
23. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. [cited 2025 Sep 07]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/202feb0d-06e8-418d-8e38-8927ec2d166b/content.
24. Dédelė A, Miškinytė A. Seasonal variation of indoor and outdoor air quality of nitrogen dioxide in homes with gas and electric stoves. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2016;23(17):17784-17792 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6978-5.
25. Morawska L, Ayoko GA, Bae GN, Buonanno G, Chao CYH, Clifford S, et al. Airborne particles in indoor environments of homes, schools, offices and aged care facilities: the main routes of exposure. Environ Int 2017;108: 75-83 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.07.025.
Figure 1.Concentrations of air pollutants measured before and after the designation of non-smoking areas in indoor sports facilities (billiard halls and screen golf ranges). (a) TVOC concentrations; (b) NO2 concentrations; (c) PM2.5 concentrations. Error bars indicate the Standard Deviation (SD) of the mean. Table 1.Measurement and analysis methods for target parameters. Table 2.Level of indoor air pollutants and measurement results in parameterized form at billiard hall and screen golf range with temperature and relative humidity.
Table 3.Overall levels of TVOC, NO2, and PM2.5 (combined before and after policy implementation) in the billiard hall and screen golf range.
a : Note on sample size: The n=4 represents the total number of samples (or measurement results used for the mean ± SD) reported for each facility category in this combined analysis. This sample size was derived from two measurements taken before the policy implementation and two measurements taken after the policy implementation for each facility category, resulting in 2 (Before) + 2 (After) = 4 samples total per pollutant per facility type; Table 4.Levels of TVOC, NO2, and PM2.5 in the billiard hall and screen golf range.
a : Note on sample size: The reported n = 12 represents the total number of individual data points used for the statistical comparison in each time period (Before/After). This was derived from monitoring six facilities in total (three billiard halls and three screen golf ranges). Therefore, the overall statistical comparison was based on 6 facilities × 2 time points = 12 points used for the paired analysis; |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||